Latvia vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Latvia
88.71
in 2014
North Macedonia
88.71
in 2014
Latvia rank
36th
North Macedonia rank
36th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Latvia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 88.71 against 88.71 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 36th of 183 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.1 | 84.19 | 2.9 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 88.71 | 88.71 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Latvia or North Macedonia?
- Latvia, at 88.71 against 88.71 in North Macedonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Latvia and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Latvia ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 36th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.