South Korea vs Sweden: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
South Korea
95.16
in 2014
Sweden
96.77
in 2014
South Korea rank
10th
Sweden rank
7th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- South Korea
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 96.77 against 95.16 in South Korea, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.32 | 96.77 | 6.45 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 95.16 | 96.77 | 1.61 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), South Korea or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 96.77 against 95.16 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between South Korea and Sweden?
- 1.61, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sweden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Sweden rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- South Korea ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 7th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.