South Korea vs Luxembourg: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
South Korea
95.16
in 2014
Luxembourg
95.16
in 2014
South Korea rank
10th
Luxembourg rank
10th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- South Korea
- Luxembourg
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 95.16 against 95.16 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 10th and Luxembourg ranks 10th of 181 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.13 | 95.16 | 4.03 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 95.16 | 95.16 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), South Korea or Luxembourg?
- South Korea, at 95.16 against 95.16 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between South Korea and Luxembourg?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Luxembourg?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- South Korea ranks 10th and Luxembourg ranks 10th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.