Kenya vs Laos: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Kenya
64.52
in 2014
Laos
64.52
in 2014
Kenya rank
121st
Laos rank
121st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Kenya
- Laos
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 64.52 against 64.52 in Laos, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 121st and Laos ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.13 | 28.71 | 17.42 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 65.81 | 58.71 | 7.1 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Kenya or Laos?
- Kenya, at 64.52 against 64.52 in Laos as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Kenya and Laos?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Laos?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Laos rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Kenya ranks 121st and Laos ranks 121st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.