Ireland vs Lithuania: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Ireland
91.94
in 2014
Lithuania
91.94
in 2014
Ireland rank
20th
Lithuania rank
20th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Ireland
  • Lithuania
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 91.94 against 91.94 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 90.32 88.71 1.61 Ireland
2010s 90.65 91.94 1.29 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Ireland or Lithuania?
Ireland, at 91.94 against 91.94 in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Ireland and Lithuania?
0, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Lithuania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ireland and Lithuania rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Ireland ranks 20th and Lithuania ranks 20th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.