Iran vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Iran
46.77
in 2014
Nigeria
51.74
in 2014
Iran rank
153rd
Nigeria rank
150th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Iran
  • Nigeria
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 51.74 against 46.77 in Iran, a difference of 4.97.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Iran's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iran ahead.

Iran ranks 153rd and Nigeria ranks 150th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 35.81 32.9 2.9 Iran
2010s 46.77 46.83 0.0516 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Iran or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 51.74 against 46.77 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Iran and Nigeria?
4.97, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Nigeria?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iran and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Iran ranks 153rd and Nigeria ranks 150th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.