Indonesia vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Indonesia
64.52
in 2014
Tanzania
64.52
in 2014
Indonesia rank
123rd
Tanzania rank
123rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Indonesia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 64.52 against 64.52 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 123rd of 183 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.9 | 50.65 | 12.26 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 65.81 | 60.32 | 5.48 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Indonesia or Tanzania?
- Indonesia, at 64.52 against 64.52 in Tanzania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Indonesia and Tanzania?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Indonesia ranks 123rd and Tanzania ranks 123rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.