India vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
India
72.48
in 2014
Maldives
70.97
in 2014
India rank
101st
Maldives rank
102nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- India
- Maldives
How they compare
India currently reports 72.48 against 70.97 in Maldives, a difference of 1.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
India ranks 101st and Maldives ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.32 | 74.19 | 13.87 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 73.51 | 70.97 | 2.54 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), India or Maldives?
- India, at 72.48 against 70.97 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between India and Maldives?
- 1.51, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Maldives?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do India and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- India ranks 101st and Maldives ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.