Iceland vs New Zealand: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Iceland
91.94
in 2014
New Zealand
91.94
in 2014
Iceland rank
20th
New Zealand rank
20th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Iceland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 91.94 against 91.94 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 20th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.94 | 91.94 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 91.94 | 91.94 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Iceland or New Zealand?
- Iceland, at 91.94 against 91.94 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Iceland and New Zealand?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Iceland and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Iceland ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 20th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.