Hungary vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Hungary
75.81
in 2014
Suriname
75.81
in 2014
Hungary rank
86th
Suriname rank
86th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Hungary
  • Suriname
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 75.81 against 75.81 in Suriname, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 86th and Suriname ranks 86th of 181 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 77.42 75.16 2.26 Hungary
2010s 76.45 75.81 0.6452 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Hungary or Suriname?
Hungary, at 75.81 against 75.81 in Suriname as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Hungary and Suriname?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Suriname?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hungary and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Hungary ranks 86th and Suriname ranks 86th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.