Honduras vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Honduras
80.65
in 2014
Slovak Republic
80.65
in 2014
Honduras rank
72nd
Slovak Republic rank
72nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Honduras
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Slovak Republic has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.97 | 70.97 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 76.77 | 80.65 | 3.87 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Honduras or Slovak Republic?
- Honduras, at 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Honduras and Slovak Republic?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Slovak Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Honduras and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Honduras ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.