Guinea vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import
Guinea
56.45
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
56.45
in 2014
Guinea rank
147th
Micronesia (country) rank
147th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import over time
- Guinea
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 56.45 against 56.45 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 147th and Micronesia (country) ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.84 | 57.1 | 2.26 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 55.48 | 56.45 | 0.9677 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea or Micronesia (country)?
- Guinea, at 56.45 against 56.45 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guinea ranks 147th and Micronesia (country) ranks 147th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.