Guinea-Bissau vs Guyana: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Guinea-Bissau
70.97
in 2014
Guyana
70.97
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
102nd
Guyana rank
102nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Guyana
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 70.97 against 70.97 in Guyana, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 102nd and Guyana ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.39 | 65.16 | 3.23 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 70.97 | 70.97 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guinea-Bissau or Guyana?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 70.97 against 70.97 in Guyana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guinea-Bissau and Guyana?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Guyana?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Guyana rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 102nd and Guyana ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.