Guatemala vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Guatemala
80.65
in 2014
Slovak Republic
80.65
in 2014
Guatemala rank
72nd
Slovak Republic rank
72nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Guatemala
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Guatemala ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 70.97 | 0.9677 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 80.65 | 80.65 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guatemala or Slovak Republic?
- Guatemala, at 80.65 against 80.65 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guatemala and Slovak Republic?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Slovak Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guatemala ranks 72nd and Slovak Republic ranks 72nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.