Guatemala vs Qatar: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import
Guatemala
80.65
in 2014
Qatar
80.65
in 2014
Guatemala rank
73rd
Qatar rank
73rd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) … days DB06-15 import over time
- Guatemala
- Qatar
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 80.65 against 80.65 in Qatar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 73rd and Qatar ranks 73rd of 184 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.65 | 74.19 | 6.45 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 80.65 | 77.42 | 3.23 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Guatemala or Qatar?
- Guatemala, at 80.65 against 80.65 in Qatar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Guatemala and Qatar?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Qatar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Qatar rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Guatemala ranks 73rd and Qatar ranks 73rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.