Grenada vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Grenada
91.94
in 2014
Mauritius
91.94
in 2014
Grenada rank
20th
Mauritius rank
20th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Grenada
  • Mauritius
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 91.94 against 91.94 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 181 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 72.58 87.74 15.16 Mauritius
2010s 90 91.94 1.94 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Grenada or Mauritius?
Grenada, at 91.94 against 91.94 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Grenada and Mauritius?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Grenada ranks 20th and Mauritius ranks 20th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.