Germany vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Germany
95.16
in 2014
United Kingdom
96.77
in 2014
Germany rank
10th
United Kingdom rank
7th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Germany
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 96.77 against 95.16 in Germany, a difference of 1.61.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 10th and United Kingdom ranks 7th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.16 | 93.55 | 1.61 | Germany |
| 2010s | 95.16 | 96.77 | 1.61 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Germany or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 96.77 against 95.16 in Germany as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Germany and United Kingdom?
- 1.61, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Germany and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Germany ranks 10th and United Kingdom ranks 7th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.