Gambia vs Suriname: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Gambia
75.81
in 2014
Suriname
75.81
in 2014
Gambia rank
88th
Suriname rank
88th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Gambia
- Suriname
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 75.81 against 75.81 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 88th and Suriname ranks 88th of 183 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70 | 75.16 | 5.16 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 75.16 | 75.81 | 0.6451 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Gambia or Suriname?
- Gambia, at 75.81 against 75.81 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Gambia and Suriname?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Gambia and Suriname rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Gambia ranks 88th and Suriname ranks 88th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.