Gabon vs Guyana: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Gabon
70.97
in 2014
Guyana
70.97
in 2014
Gabon rank
102nd
Guyana rank
102nd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Gabon
  • Guyana
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 70.97 against 70.97 in Guyana, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 102nd and Guyana ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Guyana Difference Ahead
2000s 70.97 65.16 5.81 Gabon
2010s 70.97 70.97 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Gabon or Guyana?
Gabon, at 70.97 against 70.97 in Guyana as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Gabon and Guyana?
0, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Guyana?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Gabon and Guyana rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Gabon ranks 102nd and Guyana ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.