France vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
France
88.71
in 2014
North Macedonia, Republic of
88.71
in 2014
France rank
36th
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
36th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- France
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
France currently reports 88.71 against 88.71 in North Macedonia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
France ranks 36th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 36th of 183 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | North Macedonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.16 | 84.19 | 0.9677 | France |
| 2010s | 88.71 | 88.71 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), France or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- France, at 88.71 against 88.71 in North Macedonia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between France and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 0, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do France and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- France ranks 36th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 36th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.