Finland vs South Korea: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Finland
95.16
in 2014
South Korea
95.16
in 2014
Finland rank
10th
South Korea rank
10th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Finland
- South Korea
How they compare
Finland currently reports 95.16 against 95.16 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 10th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.55 | 90.32 | 3.23 | Finland |
| 2010s | 94.52 | 95.16 | 0.6452 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Finland or South Korea?
- Finland, at 95.16 against 95.16 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Finland and South Korea?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Korea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Finland and South Korea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Finland ranks 10th and South Korea ranks 10th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.