Fiji vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Fiji
70.97
in 2014
Maldives
70.97
in 2014
Fiji rank
102nd
Maldives rank
102nd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Fiji
  • Maldives
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 70.97 against 70.97 in Maldives, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Fiji ranks 102nd and Maldives ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Maldives Difference Ahead
2000s 68.71 74.19 5.48 Maldives
2010s 70.97 70.97 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Fiji or Maldives?
Fiji, at 70.97 against 70.97 in Maldives as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Fiji and Maldives?
0, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Maldives?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Fiji and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Fiji ranks 102nd and Maldives ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.