Ethiopia vs Ghana: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Ethiopia
35.48
in 2014
Ghana
40.32
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
162nd
Ghana rank
159th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Ethiopia
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 40.32 against 35.48 in Ethiopia, a difference of 4.84.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 162nd and Ghana ranks 159th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.35 | 34.19 | 5.16 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 35.48 | 42.26 | 6.77 | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Ethiopia or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 40.32 against 35.48 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Ethiopia and Ghana?
- 4.84, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Ghana?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ethiopia and Ghana rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Ethiopia ranks 162nd and Ghana ranks 159th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.