Estonia, Republic of vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Estonia, Republic of
98.39
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Estonia, Republic of rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Estonia, Republic of
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 100 against 98.39 in Estonia, Republic of, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Estonia, Republic of ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia, Republic of | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.39 | 100 | 1.61 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 98.39 | 100 | 1.61 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Estonia, Republic of or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 100 against 98.39 in Estonia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Estonia, Republic of and Singapore?
- 1.61, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia, Republic of and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Estonia, Republic of and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Estonia, Republic of ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.