Eritrea vs Niger: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Eritrea
11.29
in 2014
Niger
8.06
in 2014
Eritrea rank
169th
Niger rank
170th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Eritrea
  • Niger
02.557.51012.5200520092014

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 11.29 against 8.06 in Niger, a difference of 3.23.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Niger ahead.

Eritrea ranks 169th and Niger ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 3.87 0 3.87 Eritrea
2010s 11.29 3.55 7.74 Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Eritrea or Niger?
Eritrea, at 11.29 against 8.06 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Eritrea and Niger?
3.23, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Eritrea ranks 169th and Niger ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.