Dominica vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Dominica
83.87
in 2014
Montenegro
83.87
in 2014
Dominica rank
52nd
Montenegro rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Dominica
- Montenegro
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 52nd and Montenegro ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.84 | 83.87 | 4.03 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 83.23 | 83.87 | 0.6452 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominica or Montenegro?
- Dominica, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominica and Montenegro?
- 0, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Dominica and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominica ranks 52nd and Montenegro ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.