Denmark vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Denmark
98.39
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Denmark rank
2nd
Singapore rank
1st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Denmark
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 100 against 98.39 in Denmark, a difference of 1.61.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.39 | 100 | 1.61 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 98.39 | 100 | 1.61 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Denmark or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 100 against 98.39 in Denmark as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Denmark and Singapore?
- 1.61, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Denmark and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Denmark ranks 2nd and Singapore ranks 1st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.