Denmark vs Kosovo: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Denmark
98.39
in 2014
Kosovo
82.26
in 2014
Denmark rank
2nd
Kosovo rank
1st

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Denmark
  • Kosovo
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 98.39 against 82.26 in Kosovo, a difference of 16.13.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 2nd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 98.39 80.65 17.74 Denmark
2010s 98.39 81.61 16.77 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Denmark or Kosovo?
Denmark, at 98.39 against 82.26 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Denmark and Kosovo?
16.13, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kosovo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Denmark and Kosovo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Denmark ranks 2nd and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.