Czech Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Czech Republic
79.03
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
79.03
in 2014
Czech Republic rank
76th
Saudi Arabia rank
76th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Czech Republic
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Czech Republic currently reports 79.03 against 79.03 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czech Republic ahead.
Czech Republic ranks 76th and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czech Republic averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czech Republic | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.13 | 66.45 | 9.68 | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 77.1 | 79.03 | 1.94 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Czech Republic or Saudi Arabia?
- Czech Republic, at 79.03 against 79.03 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Czech Republic and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Czech Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czech Republic and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Czech Republic and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Czech Republic ranks 76th and Saudi Arabia ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.