Cyprus vs Denmark: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Cyprus
98.39
in 2014
Denmark
98.39
in 2014
Cyprus rank
2nd
Denmark rank
2nd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Denmark
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 98.39 against 98.39 in Denmark, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 2nd and Denmark ranks 2nd of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 98.39 98.39 0
2010s 98.39 98.39 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cyprus or Denmark?
Cyprus, at 98.39 against 98.39 in Denmark as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cyprus and Denmark?
0, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Denmark?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Denmark rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Cyprus ranks 2nd and Denmark ranks 2nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.