Croatia, Republic of vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Croatia, Republic of
83.87
in 2014
Montenegro
83.87
in 2014
Croatia, Republic of rank
52nd
Montenegro rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Croatia, Republic of
- Montenegro
How they compare
Croatia, Republic of currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Croatia, Republic of ranks 52nd and Montenegro ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia, Republic of | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.84 | 83.87 | 4.03 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 81.61 | 83.87 | 2.26 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Croatia, Republic of or Montenegro?
- Croatia, Republic of, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Croatia, Republic of and Montenegro?
- 0, with Croatia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia, Republic of and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Croatia, Republic of and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Croatia, Republic of ranks 52nd and Montenegro ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.