Côte d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Côte d'Ivoire
54.84
in 2014
Uganda
56.45
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
149th
Uganda rank
146th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 56.45 against 54.84 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 1.61.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 149th and Uganda ranks 146th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.35 | 33.23 | 6.13 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 50.97 | 55.16 | 4.19 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Côte d'Ivoire or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 56.45 against 54.84 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
- 1.61, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 149th and Uganda ranks 146th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.