Costa Rica vs Slovenia: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Costa Rica
83.87
in 2014
Slovenia
83.87
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Costa Rica
- Slovenia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.74 | 72.58 | 4.84 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 83.87 | 82.58 | 1.29 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Costa Rica or Slovenia?
- Costa Rica, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Slovenia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.