Costa Rica vs Dominica: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Costa Rica
83.87
in 2014
Dominica
83.87
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
52nd
Dominica rank
52nd
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Costa Rica
- Dominica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 83.87 against 83.87 in Dominica, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Dominica ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Dominica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.74 | 79.35 | 11.61 | Dominica |
| 2010s | 83.87 | 83.23 | 0.6452 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Costa Rica or Dominica?
- Costa Rica, at 83.87 against 83.87 in Dominica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Costa Rica and Dominica?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Dominica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Dominica rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Dominica ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.