Congo vs Niger: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Congo
19.35
in 2014
Niger
8.06
in 2014
Congo rank
168th
Niger rank
170th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Congo
  • Niger
05101520200520092014

How they compare

Congo currently reports 19.35 against 8.06 in Niger, a difference of 11.29.

That makes Congo's figure about 2.4 times Niger's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 168th and Niger ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 6.45 0 6.45 Congo
2010s 11.61 3.55 8.06 Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Congo or Niger?
Congo, at 19.35 against 8.06 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Congo and Niger?
11.29, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Congo and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Congo ranks 168th and Niger ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.