Democratic Republic of Congo vs Niger: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 8.06 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 3.22.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.7 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Niger ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 174th and Niger ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9677 | 0 | 0.9677 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 4.84 | 3.55 | 1.29 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Democratic Republic of Congo or Niger?
- Niger, at 8.06 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Niger?
- 3.22, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Niger?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 174th and Niger ranks 173rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.