Democratic Republic of Congo vs Eritrea: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 11.29 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 6.45.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.3 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 171st and Eritrea ranks 169th of 181 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9677 | 3.87 | 2.9 | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 4.84 | 11.29 | 6.45 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Democratic Republic of Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 11.29 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea?
- 6.45, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Eritrea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 171st and Eritrea ranks 169th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.