Democratic Republic of Congo vs Congo: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 19.35 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 14.51.
That makes Congo's figure about 4.0 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 171st and Congo ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9677 | 6.45 | 5.48 | Congo |
| 2010s | 4.84 | 11.61 | 6.77 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Democratic Republic of Congo or Congo?
- Congo, at 19.35 against 4.84 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
- 14.51, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 171st and Congo ranks 168th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.