Colombia vs Romania: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Colombia
85.48
in 2014
Romania
85.48
in 2014
Colombia rank
43rd
Romania rank
43rd

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Colombia
  • Romania
20406080200520092014

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 85.48 against 85.48 in Romania, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 43rd of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 63.87 80.65 16.77 Romania
2010s 85.48 85.48 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Colombia or Romania?
Colombia, at 85.48 against 85.48 in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Colombia and Romania?
0, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Romania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Colombia and Romania rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Colombia ranks 43rd and Romania ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.