Colombia vs Mexico: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Colombia
85.48
in 2014
Mexico
88.44
in 2014
Colombia rank
43rd
Mexico rank
40th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Colombia
  • Mexico
20406080200520092014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 88.44 against 85.48 in Colombia, a difference of 2.96.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.

Colombia ranks 43rd and Mexico ranks 40th of 181 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 63.87 79.03 15.16 Mexico
2010s 85.48 87.63 2.15 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Colombia or Mexico?
Mexico, at 88.44 against 85.48 in Colombia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Colombia and Mexico?
2.96, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mexico?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Colombia and Mexico rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Colombia ranks 43rd and Mexico ranks 40th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.