China vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
China
67.74
in 2014
Comoros
67.74
in 2014
China rank
109th
Comoros rank
109th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- China
- Comoros
How they compare
China currently reports 67.74 against 67.74 in Comoros, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.
China ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.1 | 67.74 | 0.6452 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 67.74 | 67.74 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), China or Comoros?
- China, at 67.74 against 67.74 in Comoros as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between China and Comoros?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Comoros?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do China and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- China ranks 109th and Comoros ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.