Chile vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Chile
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Chile currently reports 87.1 against 85.48 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1.62.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Chile ranks 41st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.65 | 84.19 | 3.55 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 84.84 | 86.13 | 1.29 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Chile or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Chile, at 87.1 against 85.48 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Chile and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 1.62, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Chile and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Chile ranks 41st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 43rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.