How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Chile

87.1

in 2014

Saint Kitts and Nevis

87.1

in 2014

Chile rank

41st

Saint Kitts and Nevis rank

41st

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

Chile
Saint Kitts and Nevis

How they compare

Chile currently reports 87.1 against 87.1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 41st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Difference	Ahead
2000s	80.65	81.29	0.6452	Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s	84.84	86.77	1.94	Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Chile or Saint Kitts and Nevis?: Chile, at 87.1 against 87.1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?: 0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?: Chile ranks 41st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-time-to-import-days-db06-15-methodology-score/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-time-to-import-days-db06-15-methodology-score/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.