Cameroon vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Cameroon
66.13
in 2014
Mozambique
66.13
in 2014
Cameroon rank
115th
Mozambique rank
115th

Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Cameroon
  • Mozambique
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 181 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 55.48 52.9 2.58 Cameroon
2010s 65.81 63.23 2.58 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cameroon or Mozambique?
Cameroon, at 66.13 against 66.13 in Mozambique as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cameroon and Mozambique?
0, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Mozambique?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cameroon and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Cameroon ranks 115th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.