Cameroon vs Marshall Islands: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Cameroon
66.13
in 2014
Marshall Islands
66.13
in 2014
Cameroon rank
115th
Marshall Islands rank
115th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Cameroon
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 66.13 against 66.13 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 115th and Marshall Islands ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.48 | 66.13 | 10.65 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 65.81 | 66.13 | 0.3226 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cameroon or Marshall Islands?
- Cameroon, at 66.13 against 66.13 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cameroon and Marshall Islands rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Cameroon ranks 115th and Marshall Islands ranks 115th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.