Cambodia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Cambodia
67.74
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
67.74
in 2014
Cambodia rank
111th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
111th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Cambodia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 67.74 against 67.74 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Cambodia ranks 111th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 111th of 183 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.29 | 70.32 | 29.03 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 65.81 | 70 | 4.19 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cambodia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Cambodia, at 67.74 against 67.74 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cambodia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Cambodia ranks 111th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.