Cambodia vs China: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Cambodia
67.74
in 2014
China
67.74
in 2014
Cambodia rank
109th
China rank
109th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Cambodia
- China
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 67.74 against 67.74 in China, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 109th and China ranks 109th of 181 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.29 | 67.1 | 25.81 | China |
| 2010s | 65.81 | 67.74 | 1.94 | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cambodia or China?
- Cambodia, at 67.74 against 67.74 in China as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cambodia and China?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and China?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Cambodia and China rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Cambodia ranks 109th and China ranks 109th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.