Burkina Faso vs Eritrea: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Burkina Faso
27.42
in 2014
Eritrea
11.29
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
168th
Eritrea rank
171st
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Eritrea
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 27.42 against 11.29 in Eritrea, a difference of 16.13.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 2.4 times Eritrea's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Eritrea ranks 171st of 183 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.97 | 3.87 | 17.1 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 28.06 | 11.29 | 16.77 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Burkina Faso or Eritrea?
- Burkina Faso, at 27.42 against 11.29 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Burkina Faso and Eritrea?
- 16.13, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eritrea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Eritrea rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Eritrea ranks 171st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.