Burkina Faso vs Congo, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Congo, Republic of
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 27.42 against 19.35 in Congo, Republic of, a difference of 8.07.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.4 times Congo, Republic of's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Congo, Republic of ranks 170th of 183 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Congo, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.97 | 6.45 | 14.52 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 28.06 | 11.61 | 16.45 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Burkina Faso or Congo, Republic of?
- Burkina Faso, at 27.42 against 19.35 in Congo, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Burkina Faso and Congo, Republic of?
- 8.07, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Congo, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Congo, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Congo, Republic of ranks 170th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.