Brunei Darussalam vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Brunei Darussalam
82.26
in 2014
Puerto Rico
82.26
in 2014
Brunei Darussalam rank
64th
Puerto Rico rank
64th
Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 82.26 against 82.26 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 64th and Puerto Rico ranks 64th of 184 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.81 | 82.26 | 6.45 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 80.65 | 82.26 | 1.61 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology), Brunei Darussalam or Puerto Rico?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 82.26 against 82.26 in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Brunei Darussalam and Puerto Rico?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Puerto Rico?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Puerto Rico rank globally for trading across borders: time to import (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 64th and Puerto Rico ranks 64th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.